Shown below is a cylinder shaped wine barrel.
Fig. 1
From Fig. 1, we see that
and so,
Kepler’s “Wine Barrel Problem” can be stated as:
If is fixed, what value of gives the largest volume of ?
Kepler conducted extensive numerical studies on this problem. However, it was solved analytically only after the invention of calculus.
In the spring of 2012, while carrying out a research on solving maximization/minimization problems, I discovered the following theorem:
Theorem-1. For positive quantities and positive rational quantities , if is a constant, then attains its maximum if .
By applying Theorem-1, the “Wine Barrel Problem” can be solved analytically without calculus at all. It is as follows:
Rewrite (2) as
Since
and , a constant,
by Theorem-1, when
or
(see (3)) attains its maximum.
Solving (4) for positive , we have
Discovered from the same research is another theorem for solving minimization problem without calculus:
Theorem-2. For positive quantities and positive rational quantities , if is a constant, then attains its minimum if .
Let’s look at an example:
Problem: Find the minimum value of for .
Since for and , a constant,
by Theorem-2, when
attains its minimum.
Solving (5) for yields
.
Therefore, at attains its minimum value (see Fig. 2).
Fig. 2
Nonetheless, neither Theorem-1 nor Theorem-2 is a silver bullet for solving max/min problems without calculus. For example,
Problem: Find the minimum value of for .
Theorem-2 is not applicable here (see Exercise-1). To solve this problem, we proceed as follows:
From , we have
and so,
.
That is,
.
Or,
i.e.
.
Since ,
,
with the “=” sign in “” holds at .
Therefore, attains its minimum -54 at (see FIg. 3).
Fig. 3
Exercise-1 Explain why Theorem-2 is not applicable to finding the minimum of for .